Archive for March, 2013
Sorry Mr. new MP; we should not and cannot pay for a burden placed on yourself by your selfish need for re-election
“Those from whose pocket the salary is drawn, and by whose appointment the officer was made, have always a right to discuss the merits of their officers, and their modes of exercising the duties they are paid to perform.”
As newly elected MPs grumble over lowered pay, here’s my two cents: Kenyans need to be made aware that it is not an MP’s job to feed, clothe, take them to hospital, repair their roads, fundraise for them, bury them, etc. An MP makes laws, that’s it; that’s what he’s paid to do.
Now every MP can choose to be a legislator doing what he’s paid to (and probably not get re-elected); or they can choose to perpetuate the culture of handouts and let “wananichi” continue with the assumption that MP’s are cash cows (usually for the sake of of their own re-electtion). But they should only do the latter if it is funded by their own resources; especially as most already spend millions campaigning to get in knowing fully well their salaries won’t cover such expense.
The premise that MPs are an unofficial welfare system still does nothing to to further their odious push for inordinately high pay -especially as there exists a Constituency Development Fund-in the face of mass poverty in the proletariat. There’s really no way to justify higher and unsustainable pay for duties they’ve taken on that are not part of their job description and which in fact create an endemic and problematic culture that fosters misrepresentation of what an MP’s work is, and this to the detriment of future aspirants.
Otherwise MPs might as well come clean and tell the world that their motivation is money, not service, which then means we are looking at future actors in sleaze and graft since it is quite clear that that is but the only other avenue left to recoup campaign spend as well as feather nests while playing daddy to entire constituencies.
Winning is great, sure, but if you are really going to do something in life, the secret is learning how to lose. Nobody goes undefeated all the time. If you can pick up after a crushing defeat, and go on to win again, you are going to be a champion someday.
Sometimes one needs to do what’s best for the majority and not keep everyone in limbo over a lost cause. In my opinion RAO should concede so as a country we can move on, I don’t see what purpose a Court drama will serve when every sensible person with a modicum of intelligence can see all a run off will do is make us 6 billion poorer and delay Uhuru’s swearing in.
PS. Can we the non ruling class quit with the gloating and taunting and move on too. The rich ODM supporter is lamenting from the Delamere terrace while the jobless TNA youth runs the street celebrating, the former will retire to Runda and the latter to Mukuru Kayaba: what have we won or lost? The wealthy TNA businessman is activating his business contacts to rake in tenders, the poor ODM diehard is panelbeating the beatup jalopy of a URP struggling middle class father: who is winning?
Open your eyes, you will not gain anything but false pride and an annoying hubris thinking you have won anything when we both know you cannot go to statehouse and demand to be let in because you speak the same lugha as mzee.
Like someone said, if your bank account reads less than RAO and UK’s final tally then get your ass back to hustling, you will recieve no favours from either plutocrat.
“I have refused to ALLOW MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY in Kenya because it will divide Kenyans along TRIBAL LINES.Vyama vingi vitaleta UKABILA Kenya.Siku moja mtakubali haya maneno yangu”
DANIEL TOROITICH ARAP MOI
2RD MARCH 1992
I look at the slim pickings of the likes of Kiyiapi and Karua, then I look at the close to 100% votes for UK and RAO in their “ethnic strongholds” and I am left wondering: Is this really democracy?
Is the choosing of leaders based on number of votes garnered a good thing for a country where for the vast majority the only criteria considered is the tribe of the person being voted for?
How can we say we are voting for a symbol of national unity when we are engaged in a national contest of tribal chiefs and ethnic coalitions?
This would be comical if the implications of the choices we make (if you can even pretend there are choices) weren’t so grave.
Moi was correct (albeit for selfish reasons): Multi party politics has only managed to bring out the tribalism ingrained in our bones.
What a bloody shame